1. Fellowships And Internships

Osteopathic Medical Schools and Financial Aid Offices (Main and branch campuses only).

. Osteopathic medicine is a branch of the profession in the.

Osteopathic doctors can become fully licensed (medical doctors) able to practice medicine and in all 50 states and are recognized in, including all. Physician founded the profession as a rejection of the prevailing system of medical thought of the 19th century.

Still's techniques relied on, to diagnose and treat illness, and he called his practices '. By the middle of the 20th century, the profession had moved closer to mainstream medicine, adopting modern and principles. American 'osteopaths' became 'osteopathic medical doctors', ultimately achieving full practice rights as medical doctors in all 50 states, including serving in the U.S.

Armed forces as physicians. The practice has been referred to as the new 'jazz of medicine', a term coined by, an osteopathic physician who is the Dean of. In modern medicine, any has eroded steadily. Diminishing numbers of D.O. Graduates enter fields, fewer use, and increasing numbers of osteopathic graduates choose to train in programs.

An osteopathic physician (DO) is a fully licensed, patient-centered medical doctor. DO has full medical practice rights throughout the United States and in 44 countries abroad. In the 21st century, the training of osteopathic medical physicians in the United States is equivalent to the training of Doctors of Medicine (M.D.s). Osteopathic medical physicians attend four years of followed by an internship and a minimum two years of.

They use all conventional methods of diagnosis and treatment. Though still trained in OMT, the modern derivative of Still's techniques, they work in all specialties of medicine. Discussions about the future of modern medicine frequently debate the utility of maintaining separate, distinct pathways for educating physicians in the United States. Contents. Nomenclature Physicians and surgeons who graduate from osteopathic medical schools are known as osteopathic physicians or osteopathic medical doctors.

Upon graduation, they are conferred a, the (D.O.). Osteopathic curricula in other countries differ from those in the United States. European-trained practitioners of osteopathic manipulative techniques are referred to as 'osteopaths': their scope of practice excludes most medical therapies and relies more on and. While it was once common for D.O. Graduates in the United States to refer to themselves as 'osteopaths,' this term is now considered archaic and those holding the Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine degree are commonly referred to as 'osteopathic medical physicians'. Demographics.

Physicians entering U.S. Workforce by education, 2005 Currently, in 2017 - 18 there are 34 medical schools that offer the DO Degree, in 49 locations, in 34 states across the United States and 141 accredited U.S. Medical schools. In 1960, there were 13,708 physicians who were graduates of the 5 osteopathic medical schools. In 2002, there were 49,210 physicians from 19 osteopathic medical schools. Between 1980 and 2005, the number of osteopathic graduates per year increased over 250 percent from about 1,000 to 2,800.

This number is expected to approach 5,000 by 2015. In 2016, there were 33 colleges of osteopathic medicine in 48 locations, in 31 states. One in four medical students in the United States is enrolled in an osteopathic medical school. As of 2016, there are more than 129,000 osteopathic medical physicians (DOs) and osteopathic medical students in the United States. Geographic distribution of osteopathic physicians as a percentage of all physicians, by the state. Locations of osteopathic medical schools are in red. A physician demonstrates an technique to medical students at an osteopathic medical school.

Osteopathic medical students take the, similar to the, to maintain and uphold the 'core principles' of osteopathic medical philosophy. Revised in 1953, and again in 2002, the core principles are:. The body is a unit; a person is a unit of body, mind, and spirit. The body is capable of, self-healing, and health maintenance. Structure and function are reciprocally interrelated. Rational treatment is based on an understanding of these principles: body unity, self-regulation, and the interrelationship of structure and function. Contemporary osteopathic physicians practice, indistinguishable from their MD colleagues.

Significance There are different opinions on the significance of these principles. Some note that the osteopathic medical philosophy is akin to the tenets of, suggestive of a kind of within the field of medicine, one that promotes a more patient-centered, holistic approach to medicine, and emphasizes the role of the physician within the health care system. Others point out that there is nothing in the principles that would distinguish D.O. Training in any fundamental way. One study, published in found a majority of M.D.

Medical school administrators and faculty saw nothing objectionable in the core principles listed above, and some endorse them generally as broad medical principles. Andrew Taylor Still, founder of osteopathic medicine physician, founded the American School of Osteopathy (now the A.T.

Still University-Kirksville (Mo.) College of Osteopathic Medicine) in, in 1892 as a radical protest against the turn-of-the-century medical system. Still believed that the conventional medical system lacked credible efficacy, was morally corrupt, and treated effects rather than causes of disease. He founded osteopathic medicine in rural Missouri at a time when medications, surgery, and other traditional therapeutic regimens often caused more harm than good. Some of the medicines commonly given to patients during this time were, and. In addition, unsanitary surgical practices often resulted in more deaths than cures. 'To find health should be the object of the doctor.

Anyone can find disease.' Still intended his new system of medicine to be a reformation of the existing 19th-century medical practices. He imagined that someday 'rational medical therapy' would consist of manipulation of the musculoskeletal system, surgery, and very sparingly used drugs. He invented the name 'osteopathy' by blending two Greek roots osteon- for bone and -pathos for suffering in order to communicate his that disease and physiologic dysfunction were grounded in a disordered musculoskeletal system.

Thus, by diagnosing and treating the musculoskeletal system, he believed that physicians could treat a variety of diseases and spare patients the negative side-effects of drugs. Mark Twain was a vocal supporter of the early osteopathic movement. The new profession faced stiff opposition from the medical establishment at the time. The relationship of the osteopathic and medical professions was often 'bitterly contentious' and involved 'strong efforts' by medical organizations to discredit osteopathic medicine. Throughout the first half of the twentieth century, the policy of the labeled osteopathic medicine as a. The AMA code of ethics declared it unethical for a medical physician to voluntarily associate with an osteopath. 'To ask a doctor's opinion of osteopathy is equivalent to going to Satan for information about Christianity.'

, 1901 One notable advocate for the fledgling movement was. Manipulative treatments had purportedly alleviated the symptoms of his daughter as well as Twain's own.

In 1909, he spoke before the at a hearing regarding the practice of osteopathy in the state. 'I don't know as I cared much about these osteopaths until I heard you were going to drive them out of the state, but since I heard that I haven't been able to sleep.' Philosophically opposed to the American Medical Association's stance that its own type of medical practice was the only legitimate one, he spoke in favor of licensing for osteopaths. Physicians from the responded with a vigorous attack on Twain, who retorted with 'the physicians think they are moved by regard for the best interests of the public. Isn't there a little touch of self-interest back of it all?' '. The objection is, people are curing people without a license and you are afraid it will bust up business.' Evolution of osteopathic medicine's mission and identity Years Identity & Mission 1892 to 1950 Manual medicine 1951 to 1970 Family practice / manual therapy 1971 to present Full service care / multispeciality orientation 1916–1966, federal recognition Recognition by the was a key goal of the osteopathic medical profession in its effort to establish equivalency with its M.D.

Between 1916 and 1966, the profession engaged in a 'long and tortuous struggle' for the right to serve as physicians and surgeons in the. On May 3, 1966 authorized the acceptance of osteopathic physicians into all the medical military services on the same basis as MDs. The first osteopathic physician to take the oath of office to serve as a military physician was Harry J. The acceptance of osteopathic physicians was further solidified in 1996 when was appointed to serve as, the only osteopathic physician to hold the post. 1962, California. Main article: In the 1960s in California, the American Medical Association (AMA) spent nearly 8 million to end the practice of osteopathic medicine in the state. In 1962, Proposition 22, a statewide ballot initiative in California, eliminated the practice of osteopathic medicine in the state.

The California Medical Association (CMA) issued M.D. Degrees to all in the state of California for a nominal fee.

'By attending a short seminar and paying $65, a doctor of osteopathy (D.O.) could obtain an M.D. Degree; 86 percent of the DOs in the state (out of a total of about 2000) chose to do so.' Immediately following, the AMA re-accredited the University of California at Irvine College of Osteopathic Medicine as the, an M.D. Medical school. It also placed a ban on issuing physician licenses to DOs moving to California from other states. However, the decision proved to be controversial. In 1974, after protests and lobbying by influential and prominent DOs, the ruled in, that licensing of DOs in that state must be resumed.

Four years later, in 1978, the opened in Pomona, and in 1997 opened in. As of 2012, there were 6,368 D.O.s practicing in California. 1969, AMA House of Delegates approval. DO residents in AOA (D.O.) programs.

In 1969, the American Medical Association (AMA) approved a measure allowing qualified osteopathic physicians as full and active members of the Association. The measure also allowed osteopathic physicians to participate in AMA-approved intern and. However, the rejected this measure, claiming it was an attempt to eliminate the distinctiveness of osteopathic medicine. In 1970, AMA President Dwight L.

Sponsored a measure in the AMA's House of Delegates permitting the AMA Board of Trustees' plan for the merger of D.O. Today, a majority of osteopathic physicians are trained alongside MDs, in residency programs governed by the, an independent board of the AMA.

Fellowships And Internships

1993, first African-American woman to serve as dean of a U.S. Medical school In 1993, Barbara Ross-Lee, DO was appointed to the position of dean of the; she was the first African-American woman to serve as the dean of a U.S. Medical school. Ross-Lee now is the dean of the at in. Non-discrimination policies Recent years have seen a professional rapprochement between the two groups. DOs have been admitted to full active membership in the American Medical Association since 1969. The AMA has invited a representative of the American Osteopathic Association to sit as a voting member in the AMA legislative body, the house of delegates.

2006, American Medical Student Association In 2006, during the presidency of an osteopathic medical student, the (AMSA) adopted a policy regarding the membership rights of osteopathic medical students in their main policy document, the 'Preamble, Purposes and Principles.' AMSA RECOGNIZES the equality of osteopathic and allopathic medical degrees within the organization and the healthcare community as a whole. As such, DO students shall be entitled to the same opportunities and membership rights as allopathic students. — PPP, AMSA 2007, AMA In recent years, the largest M.D. Organization in the U.S., the American Medical Association, adopted a fee non-discrimination policy discouraging differential pricing based on attendance of an M.D. Medical school. In 2006, calls for an investigation into the existence of differential fees charged for visiting D.O.

Medical students at American medical schools were brought to the American Medical Association. After an internal investigation into the fee structure for visiting D.O. Medical students at M.D.

Medical schools, it was found that one institution of the 102 surveyed charged different fees for D.O. The house of delegates of the American Medical Association adopted resolution 809, I-05 in 2007. Our AMA, in collaboration with the American Osteopathic Association, discourages discrimination against medical students by institutions and programs based on osteopathic or allopathic training. Years in which states passed laws granting DOs medical practice rights equal to MDs 1901–1930 1931–1966 1967–1989 State licensing of practice rights In the United States, laws regulating physician licenses are governed by the states. Between 1901 and 1989, osteopathic physicians lobbied state legislatures to pass laws giving those with a D.O. Degree the same legal privilege to practice medicine as those with an M.D.

In many states, the debate was long and protracted. Both the AOA and the AMA were heavily involved in influencing the legislative process. The first state to pass such a law was California in 1901, the last was in 1989. Current status Osteopathic medical schools Region School Website Midwest & Plains Northeast Southeast West Education and training.

Main articles: and According to, 'the training, practice, credentialing, licensure, and reimbursement of osteopathic physicians is virtually indistinguishable from those of physicians, with 4 years of osteopathic medical school followed by specialty and subspecialty training and.' D.O.-granting U.S. Medical schools have similar to those of M.D.-granting schools. Generally, the first two years are classroom-based, while the third and fourth years consist of through the major specialties of medicine. Some schools of Osteopathic Medicine have been criticized by the osteopathic community for relying too heavily on clinical rotations with private practitioners, who may not be able to provide sufficient instruction to the rotating student. Other D.O.-granting and M.D.-granting schools place their students in hospital-based clinical rotations where the attending physicians are faculty of the school, and who have a clear duty to teach medical students while treating patients.

Graduate medical education. Sources of the 24,012 medical school graduates entering U.S.

Physician training programs in 2004. Upon graduation, most osteopathic medical physicians pursue training programs. Depending on state licensing laws, osteopathic medical physicians may also complete a one-year rotating at a hospital approved by the (AOA).

Osteopathic physicians may apply to residency programs accredited by either the AOA or the (ACGME). Currently, osteopathic physicians participate in more ACGME programs than in programs approved by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA). By June 30, 2020, all AOA residencies will also be required to have ACGME accreditation, and the AOA will cease accreditation activities. Main article: Within the osteopathic medical curriculum, manipulative treatment is taught as an adjunctive measure to other biomedical interventions for a number of disorders and diseases. However, a 2001 survey of osteopathic physicians found that more than 50% of the respondents used OMT on less than 5% of their patients.

The survey follows many indicators that osteopathic physicians have become more like M.D. Physicians in every respect —few perform OMT, and most prescribe medications or suggest surgery as the first line of treatment.

The has made an effort in recent years to support scientific inquiry into the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulation as well as to encourage osteopathic physicians to consistently offer manipulative treatments to their patients. However, the number of osteopathic physicians who report consistently prescribing and performing manipulative treatment has been falling steadily.

Medical historian and sociologist cites poor educational quarters and few full-time OMT instructors as major factors for the decreasing interest of medical students in OMT. He describes problems with 'the quality, breadth, nature, and orientation of OMM instruction,' and he claims that the teaching of osteopathic medicine has not changed sufficiently over the years to meet the intellectual and practical needs of students.

In their assigned readings, students learn what certain prominent DOs have to say about various. There is often a theory or model presented that provides conjectures and putative explanations about why somatic dysfunction exists and what its significance is. Instructors spend the bulk of their time demonstrating osteopathic manipulative (OM) techniques without providing evidence that the techniques are significant and efficacious. Even worse, faculty members rarely provide instrument-based objective evidence that somatic dysfunction is present in the first place.

At the same time, recent studies show an increasingly positive attitude of patients and physicians (M.D. And D.O.) towards the use of manual therapy as a valid, safe and effective treatment modality. One survey, published in the Journal of, found that a majority of physicians (81%) and patients (76%) felt that manual manipulation (MM) was safe, and over half (56% of physicians and 59% of patients) felt that manipulation should be available in the primary care setting. Although less than half (40%) of the physicians reported any educational exposure to MM and less than one-quarter (20%) have administered MM in their practice, most (71%) respondents endorsed desiring more instruction in MM.

Another small study examined the interest and ability of M.D. Residents in learning osteopathic principles and skills, including OMT. It showed that after a 1-month elective rotation, the M.D. Residents responded favorably to the experience. Professional attitudes In 1998, a New York Times article described the increasing numbers, public awareness, and mainstreaming of osteopathic medical physicians, illustrating an increasingly cooperative climate between the D.O. In 2005, during his tenure as president of the, Jordan Cohen described a climate of cooperation between D.O.

Practitioners: 'We now find ourselves living at a time when osteopathic and allopathic graduates are both sought after by many of the same residency programs; are in most instances both licensed by the same licensing boards; are both privileged by many of the same hospitals; and are found in appreciable numbers on the faculties of each other's medical schools'. Elsewhere, he has remarked that 'can be an aid to the physician in fostering a relationship with the patient.' International practice rights. International practice rights of U.S. Trained DOs Each country has different requirements and procedures for licensing or registering osteopathic physicians and osteopaths.

The only osteopathic practitioners that the recognizes as physicians are graduates of. Therefore, osteopaths who have trained outside the United States are not eligible for medical licensure in the United States. On the other hand, U.S.-trained DOs are currently able to practice in 45 countries with full medical rights and in several others with restricted rights. The Bureau on International Osteopathic Medical Education and Affairs (BIOMEA) is an independent board of the American Osteopathic Association. The BIOMEA monitors the licensing and registration practices of physicians in countries outside of the United States and advances the recognition of American-trained DOs. Towards this end, the BIOMEA works with international health organizations like the (WHO), the (PAHO) as well as other groups. The procedure by which countries consider granting physician licensure to foreigners varies widely.

Trained physicians, the ability to qualify for 'unlimited practice rights' also varies according to one's degree, or Many countries recognize U.S.-trained MDs as applicants for licensure, granting successful applicants 'unlimited' practice rights. The American Osteopathic Association has lobbied the governments of other countries to recognize U.S.-trained DOs similarly to their M.D. Counterparts, with some success. This box:. In over 65 countries, U.S.-trained DOs have unlimited practice rights. In 2005, after one year of deliberations, the announced that U.S.-trained DOs will be accepted for full medical practice rights in the United Kingdom.

According to Josh Kerr of the AOA, 'some countries don’t understand the differences in training between an and an.' The American Medical Student Association strongly advocates for U.S.-trained D.O. International practice rights 'equal to that' of M.D. Qualified physicians. Osteopathic medicine and primary care.

Trends in primary care as a career choice of osteopathic medical students 4th year students 1st year students Osteopathic physicians have historically entered primary care fields at a higher rate than their M.D. Some osteopathic organizations make claims to a greater emphasis on the importance of primary care within osteopathic medicine. However, the proportion of osteopathic students choosing primary care fields, like that of their M.D. Peers, is declining.

Currently, only one in five osteopathic medical students enters a residency (the largest primary care field). In 2004, only 32% of osteopathic seniors planned careers in any primary care field; this percentage was down from a peak in 1996 of more than 50%. Criticism and internal debate. First-year enrollment at osteopathic medical schools, 1968–2011 OMT Traditional osteopathic medicine, specifically OMT, has been criticized for many techniques such as. A study performed in the early 2000s questioned the therapeutic utility of osteopathic manipulative treatment modalities. Also, health information website claims that 'it is difficult to properly ascertain the effectiveness of a hands-on therapy like OMT.' Research emphasis Another area of criticism has been the relative lack of research and lesser emphasis on scientific inquiry at D.O.

Schools in comparison with M.D. The inability to institutionalize research, particularly clinical research, at osteopathic institutions has, over the years, weakened the acculturation, socialization, and distinctive beliefs and practices of osteopathic students and graduates.

Identity crisis There is currently a debate within the osteopathic community over the feasibility of maintaining osteopathic medicine as a distinct entity within U.S. JD Howell, author of The Paradox of Osteopathy, notes claims of a 'fundamental yet ineffable difference' between MD and DO qualified physicians are based on practices such as 'preventive medicine and seeing patients in a sociological context' that are 'widely encountered not only in osteopathic medicine but also in allopathic medicine.' Studies have confirmed the lack of any 'philosophic concept or resultant practice behavior' that would distinguish a D.O. Howell summarizes the questions framing the debate over the future of osteopathic distinctiveness thus: If osteopathy has become the functional equivalent of allopathy meaning the MD profession, what is the justification for its continued existence? And if there is value in therapy that is uniquely osteopathic, why should its use be limited to osteopaths? Rapid expansion As the number of osteopathic schools has increased, the debate over distinctiveness has often seen the leadership of the American Osteopathic Association at odds with the community of osteopathic physicians.

Within the osteopathic community, the growth is drawing attention to the identity crisis faced by the profession. While osteopathic leaders emphasize osteopaths' unique identity, many osteopaths would rather not draw attention to their uniqueness. The rapid expansion has raised concerns about the number of available faculty at osteopathic schools and the role that those faculty play in maintaining the integrity of the academic program of the schools., author of the leading text on the history of osteopathic medicine, recently published, DO schools are currently expanding their class sizes much more quickly than are their MD counterparts.

Unlike MD colleges, where it is widely known that academic faculty members—fearing dilution of quality as well as the prospect of an increased teaching workload—constitute a powerful inhibiting force to expand the class size, osteopathic faculty at private osteopathic schools have traditionally had little or no input on such matters. Instead, these decisions are almost exclusively the responsibility of college administrators and their boards of trustees, who look at such expansion from an entrepreneurial as well as an educational perspective. Osteopathic medical schools can keep the cost of student body expansion relatively low compared with that of MD institutions. Although the standards of the Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation ensure that there will be enough desks and lab spaces to accommodate all new students, they do not mandate that an osteopathic college must bear the expense of maintaining a high full-time-faculty:student ratio. The president of the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine commented on the current climate of crisis within the profession. The simultaneous movement away from osteopathic medicine’s traditionally separate training and practice systems, when coupled with its rapid growth, has created a sense of crisis as to its future. The rapid rate of growth has raised questions as to the availability of clinical and basic science faculty and clinical resources to accommodate the increasing load of students.

See also. References. ^ Meyer CT, Price A (1 April 1993). (Free full text).

The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 93 (4): 473–485. ^ Patrick Wu; Jonathan Siu (2012). American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. Retrieved 20 August 2013.

Retrieved 2017-12-12. Lloyd, Janice (18 August 2009).

Retrieved 8 September 2009. ^ Shannon SC, Teitelbaum HS (June 2009). 'The status and future of osteopathic medical education in the United States'. Academic Medicine.

84 (6): 707–711. ^ Gevitz N (2009). 'The transformation of osteopathic medical education'. 84 (6): 701–6. ^ Cohen JJ (Jun 2009). 'The separate osteopathic medical education pathway: isn't it time we got our acts together?

Academic Medicine. 84 (6): 696. Retrieved August 21, 2016.

^ Dennis L. Kasper, Eugene Braunwald, Anthony S. Fauci, Stephen L. Hauser, Dan L. Larry Jameson, and Kurt J. Isselbacher, Eds.

Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 16th Ed. Lesho EP (Nov 1999). (Free full text). Archives of Family Medicine. 8 (6): 477–484. 2007-04-15 at the.

Accessed Dec 2007. DiGiovanna, Eileen L.; Schiowitz, Stanley; Dowling, Dennis J. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Chen C, Mullan F (Jun 2009). 'The separate osteopathic medical education pathway: uniquely addressing national needs. Academic Medicine. 84 (6): 695.

Gevitz N (Mar 1997). ' 'Visible and recognized': osteopathic invisibility syndrome and the two percent solution'. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

97 (3): 168–170. Clark RC (1 January 2000). (Free full text). The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 100 (1): 6–8.

Oths, Kathryn S.; Servando Z. 'Divergences in the evolution of Osteopathy'.

Rowman Altamira. Retrieved 2012-06-06. American Osteopathic Association website. Accessed 17 May 2012. ^ Cohen, Jordan. Reporter: April 2005.

Association of American Medical Colleges. Archived from on 2013-08-12. Retrieved 2006-12-13.

Salsberg E, Grover A (September 2006). 'Physician workforce shortages: implications and issues for academic health centers and policymakers'.

Academic Medicine. 81 (9): 782–787. AOA Annual Statistics, 2016. AOA Annual Statistics 2016 American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. January 2016. Retrieved January 2016. Check date values in: access-date= Cite error: Invalid tag; name 'OMP2015' defined multiple times with different content (see the ).

Cite error: Invalid tag; name 'OMP2015' defined multiple times with different content (see the ). Retrieved 2012-06-21. ^ American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. Association of American Medical Colleges. Retrieved November 2011.

Check date values in: access-date=. (PDF). American Osteopathic Association. Retrieved September 2011. Check date values in: access-date=. Licciardone JC (2003). 'Awareness and use of osteopathic physicians in the United States: Results of the Second Osteopathic Survey of Health Care in America (OSTEOSURV-II)'.

The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 103 (6): 281–289.

Licciardone JC (7 January 2007). Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care. ^ Gevitz N (Mar 2006). (Free full text). The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

106 (3): 121–129. Intelihealth.com. April 15, 2007, at the.

^ Zuger, Abigail (February 17, 1998). The New York Times. American Osteopathic Association. Archived from on 6 September 2012.

Retrieved 30 August 2007. Kansas City, Mo: Hudson-Kimberly Pub Co; 1902:9–20,185,210,270. Inter Linea Web site. Accessed January 23, 2006. Hansen GP (1 March 2006).

(Free full text). The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

106 (3): 114–116. Chapter 34: Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Goldman: Cecil Textbook of Medicine, 22nd ed.

^ Gevitz N (1 May 1998). (Free full text).

The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 98 (5): 279–286. Ober KP (15 January 1997).

(Free full text). Annals of Internal Medicine. 126 (2): 157–163. Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences. Retrieved Aug 15, 2015. ^ Howell JD (1999). 'The paradox of osteopathy'.

341 (19): 1465–8. ^ Gevitz, Norman (2004). The DO's: osteopathic medicine in America. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. Crum JF (Jan 1975). The Western Journal of Medicine. 122 (1): 87–90.

Kathy Robertson (March 23, 2012). Sacramento Business Journal. Retrieved June 5, 2012.

Brotherton SE, Rockey PH, Etzel SI (2005). 'US graduate medical education, 2004-2005: trends in primary care specialties'. 294 (9): 1075–82. 2008-04-11 at the. AAMC. ^ Tulgan H, DeMarco WJ, Pugnaire MP, Buser BR (May 2004). 'Joint clinical clerkships for osteopathic and allopathic medical students: New England's experience'.

The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 104 (5): 212–214. National Library of Medicine.

Retrieved May 17, 2012. ^ Wilson, Jennifer Fisher. ACP Internist. Archived from on 2008-12-05. Retrieved November 1997. Check date values in: access-date=. ^ Preamble, Purposes and Principles.

Retrieved 2012-11-30. Thomas, Melissa. Report of the Council on Medical Education (Report 6-A-07). American Medical Association. Retrieved 1 July 2012. Hubbard, Kevin (January 17, 2011). Missouri Association of Osteopathic Physicians and Surgeons.

Retrieved May 4, 2011. Shannon, Stephen C. 2008-04-11 at the. Accessed Feb 2007. Retrieved 2016-05-24. Johnson SM, Kurtz ME (2001). 76 (8): 821–8.

Gevitz N (Mar 2006). (Free full text).

The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 106 (3): 121–129. Licciardone J, Gamber R, Cardarelli K (January 2002). 'Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes associated with osteopathic manipulative treatment'. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 102 (1): 13–20. Stoll ST, Russo DP, Atchison JW (Winter 2003).

'Physicians' and patients' attitudes toward manual medicine: implications for continuing medical education'. The Journal of continuing education in the health professions. 23 (1): 13–20. Leiber JD (Nov 2005). (Free full text). Family medicine. 37 (10): 693–695.

Cohen, Jordan. American Medical Association. Retrieved 14 July 2012. Federal Register. American Osteopathic Association. AOA International License Summary.

Council on International Osteopathic Medical Education and Affairs. American Osteopathic Association. Archived from on 6 September 2012. Retrieved 12 June 2013. ^ Singer, Allen M. American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine.

Cummings M, Dobbs KJ (Jul 2005). Install sp3 on windows xp embedded. 'The irony of osteopathic medicine and primary care'. Academic Medicine. 80 (7): 702–705.

(Free full text). American Family Physician. Robert, Ward (2002). Foundations for Osteopathic Medicine: The research status of somatic dysfunction (2nd ed.).

Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ^ Gevitz N (Mar 2001). (Free full text). The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 101 (3): 174–179.

Kelso A, Townsend A. The status and future of osteopathic research. In: Northup G, ed.

Osteopathic Research: Growth and Development. Chicago, Ill: American Osteopathic Association; 1987. Licciardone JC (2007).

Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care. Gevitz N (1 April 1994). (Free full text). The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

94 (4): 328–332. Teitelbaum HS, Bunn WE, Brown SA, Burchett AW (October 2003).

The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 103 (10): 489–90. Archived from on 2016-03-05. Tatum, William O, IV.

2008-01-25 at the. J Am Osteopath Assoc. Vol 106 No 8 p442-443. Mychaskiw G (May 2006). (Free full text).

The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 106 (5): 252–253, 302; 253 302–253. Steier KJ (1 May 2006). (Free full text). The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

106 (5): 250–252. Tosca M (Jun 2006). (Free full text). The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

106 (6): 319. Shannon, Stephen C.

Inside Osteopathic Medical Education. February 1, 2008. Howell, J D N Engl J Med. Volume 342:817–820 Number 11. March 16, 2000. Johnson SM, Kurtz ME (Dec 2002).

'Perceptions of philosophic and practice differences between US osteopathic physicians and their allopathic counterparts'. Social science & medicine (1982). 55 (12): 2141–2148. Licciardone JC (Jan 2007). (Free full text). Osteopathic medicine and primary care.

Further reading. The DO's: Osteopathic Medicine in America, 2004 (2nd Edition), paperback, 264 pages, The Johns Hopkins University Press,. Science in the Art of Osteopathy: Osteopathic Principles and Models, Caroline Stone, Nelson Thornes, 1999, paperback, 384 pages,. An Osteopathic Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment, Eileen DiGiovanna, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2004, hardback, 600 pages.